View Full Version : 2005 V50 Rear Break Issues?


L0stS0ul
05-02-2008, 10:24 AM
Hello,

I have a 2005 V50 and my 3 year 35000 mile maintenance package just expired in February. I just today took the car in for the 38000 mile scheduled maintenance as the car was telling me it was time to go in. The car was just inspected in February and passed without issue. I just found out that the 38000 mile scheduled maintenance is a $430 charge. Not sure what they are all doing. The mumbled something about a break system flush or something or other.

I took the car in this morning and I just got a call from the Volvo dealership. They said that their tech had found that my rear break pads were completely worn and they need to be replaced immediately. Apparently the front breaks are fine. I know the car has a rear break bias but enough to cause the rear break pads to go so far ahead of the front break pads and at less then 40k miles? Something doesn't seem right to me. It's another $200 charge tacked on. If the break pads are so bad off how could they have not seen this at the inspection less then 2 months ago?

Then they proceed to tell me that my tires need to be replaced and that they could do all the work today for a little over $1500. Does it sound like I'm being taken for a ride here? It sure does to me. No way would I have them do the tires but they are telling me it's not safe to drive the car with the rear break pads like that so I told them to go ahead and replace them.

Anyone else had similar issues with rear break pads wearing so fast?

Thanks!

reg
05-06-2008, 06:51 PM
hmmmm Do you think they found that brakes break??

OK, low blow.

r.

OK, reality is that there is no money in it either for the tech or for the facility (Volvo) in 'free' work. Warranty work does not pay and so non-warranty work is what puts the money in the pocket! It is no surprise that the dealer suddenly found issues with your Volvo..........it is to be expected. As to the rear brakes I would have pulled a wheel and checked them myself. It is a possibility that the rears can 'go' first although in 45 years of experience I seldom have found that to occur with my autos...........in fact I have found that the front pads are generally replaced twice prior to replacing the rears.

Rule of thumb: Caveat Emptor

r.

mncx
05-25-2008, 01:00 AM
On V50 the pads at rear always worn faster than the front... u will go through 2 sets rear pads before 1 set front pads needed... I've notice.. turbo or non turbo I have notice the car tends to have wheel spins often even with traction control... tires do wear out fast on those car.. 38000miles actually is not consider wearing too fast... 16" wheel with Michelin MXV4 S4 don't wear as fast.. the 17" with MXM4 wear out even faster. Not to mention tire pressures need to be checked at least once a month if lazy...