mpg m47 with 3.73 gears

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-25-2016, 03:50 PM
beleive's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default mpg m47 with 3.73 gears

Im getting 25-26mpg now with the 3.30 gears with the m47 five speed. I would like to add some lowend to the car. Its a 90 volo 240 the tires (205x55x 16). I have a 3.73 rearend I could bolt in. Just curious if it would kill my milage? Is anybody running this combo to give me some kind of idea. Thanks
 

Last edited by beleive; 09-26-2016 at 12:13 AM.
  #2  
Old 09-25-2016, 08:12 PM
Volvodok's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have the zf hp22 in my 262 and 3:73 gears. Got a 91 with alb m47 3:31 gears.installed the alb and used the 3:31 axel.lost some mpg and performance.reinstalled the 3:73 and mpg is back up and drives like it use to. Do it.
 
  #3  
Old 09-26-2016, 10:32 PM
Moetheshmoe's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Salinas, Ca
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by beleive
Im getting 25-26mpg now with the 3.30 gears with the m47 five speed. I would like to add some lowend to the car. Its a 90 volo 240 the tires (205x55x 16). I have a 3.73 rearend I could bolt in. Just curious if it would kill my milage? Is anybody running this combo to give me some kind of idea. Thanks
I'm actually thinking about going the opposite way. I have a 940 turbo wagon with the stock 3.73 rear end and I have a 3.30 out of a 960 wagon I'd like to switch to improve my mileage. Right now I get exactly what they list 17 mpg in town and 22 highway. You say you get 25-26, is that in town or highway?
 
  #4  
Old 09-26-2016, 10:36 PM
beleive's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Moetheshmoe
I'm actually thinking about going the opposite way. I have a 940 turbo wagon with the stock 3.73 rear end and I have a 3.30 out of a 960 wagon I'd like to switch to improve my mileage. Right now I get exactly what they list 17 mpg in town and 22 highway. You say you get 25-26, is that in town or highway?
That is highway. My engine has no turbo. So its a real dog with 3.30's.
 
  #5  
Old 09-26-2016, 10:50 PM
Moetheshmoe's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Salinas, Ca
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by beleive
That is highway. My engine has no turbo. So its a real dog with 3.30's.
I'm surprised because non turbo 940's are rated at 25-26 mpg with the 3.73 ratio. With a 3.30 I would guess they'd be pushing 30 mpg?
 
  #6  
Old 09-27-2016, 04:15 PM
Nichals's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

dude I have stock setup and I get 16-17 mpg
 
  #7  
Old 09-28-2016, 01:07 AM
pierce's Avatar
no mo volvo
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 37 North on the left coast
Posts: 11,289
Received 101 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

these turbos get ****ty mileage, don't think there's much you can do about it.

a lower rear end ratio would mean you'd be turning less RPMs to maintain cruise speed but would need more torque which means you'd be on more boost which likely would neutralize any MPG gain from the RPM difference. it also would make the car accelerate slower in every gear, requiring more throttle and boost to accelerate.
 
  #8  
Old 09-28-2016, 06:06 AM
act1292's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,735
Received 41 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nichals
dude I have stock setup and I get 16-17 mpg
This is rather poor mileage for a 240. I never really liked the mileage that my 240 got - especially around town. On the highway a properly tuned normally aspirated 240 with an automatic should get around 24-26 mpg. Around town it will get less. I usually see 21-23 mpg around town. In the winter it is less for both.

If your getting 16-17, you might want to check a few things. Is your temp coolant sensor functioning properly? If not, the ECU might think it is cold and enrich the mixture. Also, if you have any exhaust leaks upstream of your catalytic convertor, it will allow fresh air in the exhaust stream which is sensed by the O2 sensor making the ECU think that it is running lean and thus enriching the mixture. Any unmetered air getting entering the intake will also hurt your mileage but usually there are other symptoms when this happens.
 
  #9  
Old 09-28-2016, 10:05 AM
Moetheshmoe's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Salinas, Ca
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pierce
these turbos get ****ty mileage, don't think there's much you can do about it.

a lower rear end ratio would mean you'd be turning less RPMs to maintain cruise speed but would need more torque which means you'd be on more boost which likely would neutralize any MPG gain from the RPM difference. it also would make the car accelerate slower in every gear, requiring more throttle and boost to accelerate.
Actually, I think it might work. Last year I bought some cheap, oversize tires to experiment with changing ratios. Didn't seem to bog down the engine and did improve the mileage, but I only dropped it to 3.5. So, what the hell, I'll try it and see what happens.
 
  #10  
Old 06-27-2019, 04:03 PM
beleive's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default know this is old post but

Originally Posted by beleive
Im getting 25-26mpg now with the 3.30 gears with the m47 five speed. I would like to add some lowend to the car. Its a 90 volo 240 the tires (205x55x 16). I have a 3.73 rearend I could bolt in. Just curious if it would kill my milage? Is anybody running this combo to give me some kind of idea. Thanks
did you try it? If so let us know the difference it made. Im thinking about doing the same thing.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xactorocker
Volvo 240, 740 & 940
2
09-03-2018 10:37 PM
akabond
Volvo S80
6
06-16-2012 10:03 PM
Scott6
Volvo S60 & V60
8
10-21-2008 03:03 PM
fundunski
Volvo V70
2
05-25-2008 01:47 AM
fritzlovesmary
Volvo S60 & V60
9
01-07-2008 08:18 AM



Quick Reply: mpg m47 with 3.73 gears



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.