I have 2 Volvos right now and have been very pleased. Soon I'll be looking to replace them. I've looked at the independent safety ratings and was surprised to find that other makes actually rate higher on safety. This suprises me since I always thought Volvo was the leader in the field with no close second. Are there factors that aren't commonly included in the measurment that would give Volvo the real edge, or am I grasping at straws here. As an aside, I'm very disappointed that Volvo has not aggressively pursued hybrid technology so this is making me consider other options anyway, but I wanted to gather facts before deciding.

 

Volvo is always last to the game with various technology (such as hybrids) but first with safety features. For example- the blind spot warning systems on many cars now was invented by Volvo.

Not sure about the independent safety ratings.

The hybrid XC90 is on the way, BTW.

 

Volvo is quietly investing in the electronics (Volvo Self-Driving Electric Car | Digital Trends ). Think about what the safety ratings do - they say if a car is it at a 30 degree angle while going 40 mph, this car crumpled better than that one. What I'd rather see is technology that keeps me from getting hit at a 30 degree angle while going 40... (which is where Volvo is putting their money).

 

Unless Volvo thinks that some folks are smart enough to work out the ROI miles/time on a hybrid......
The safety ratings are so adrift it isn't funny.
Look at some of the tests to make the mark, and hopefully you'll see the light. I would certainly still trust a Volvo more than about any other make, when it comes to safety.

Martin

 

Mercedes, Saab and others have historically been comprable, safety wise, as Volvo. Saab's out of the picture. But currently, with increased and more widespread technological advances, there are many other makes including Hyundai and Kia, whose safety ratings are as good in certain categories. Seems it's true competition is good for everyone. The customer wins!