1990 Volvo Rich Fuel Mixture

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 02-01-2015, 10:15 PM
pierce's Avatar
no mo volvo
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 37 North on the left coast
Posts: 11,289
Received 102 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

on the later 740 (and all 940) turbos, there's a electrical connection to a fitting on the fresh air intake hose that goes between the MAF and the turbo, this fitting has a heater element in it, and is connected to the crankcase ventilation via a 1"(?) hose/pipe.
 
  #22  
Old 02-12-2015, 07:04 PM
joshfrigmont's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Pierce for all your help!
Unfortunately, the problem has returned. Putting the new MAF kept the CE light off for about a day. The gas pedal wasn't acting very responsive so I decided to clean the MAF. After putting it back in the CE light came back. I kind of believe it was a fluke that the CE stayed off for the day. It didn't stay off long enough for me to gauge whether or not my milage improved.
I finally buckled and took it to a volvo specialist for a diagnosis. I guess he tested my o2, fpr, and maf, and told me they're all functioning properly.
He also stated that since my i don't have a proper catylitic converter that he was incapable of running certian tests.
He said his next step would be to try a different ECU but he didn't have one on hand that's compatible with my 740.
According to him, I have a "federal" car and not a "california" car.
I took a look at my Ecu and here's the model
Bosch
0 280 000 563
3 517 370

He led me to believe that I need to find an ECU where all the numbers are identical.
Is that true? Does the Botch Model model number need to be exactly the same? I think he said something about the last 3 numbers but I'm still in the dark.

P.S. - I wasn't charged for this information since he wasn't able to provide me any definative answers. Though it sucks that my car is still taking up so much gas I feel a little better about myself having spent so much time on trying to fix it. Even someone who is a volvo specialist is perplexed so I can live with all my failed attempts at fixing this issue.
 
  #23  
Old 02-12-2015, 07:12 PM
pierce's Avatar
no mo volvo
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 37 North on the left coast
Posts: 11,289
Received 102 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Engine ECU suggests that a -563 was used on model year 1990-91 turbos. there's a list on that table of supposedly compataible ECUs (they are all 0 280 000 xxx, so only the last 3 digits distinguish them)

re: california vs federal, there should be an emissions control sticker under the hood that says whether its 49 state or 50 state (California approved).

does your car have an EGR valve? afaik, california turbos all have EGR valves, so you'd see the EGR pipe coming off the exhaust side of the turbo, and going around behind the block, also see the EGR vacuum modulator, near the power steering reservoir.
 
  #24  
Old 02-12-2015, 09:09 PM
joshfrigmont's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pierce
Engine ECU suggests that a -563 was used on model year 1990-91 turbos. there's a list on that table of supposedly compataible ECUs (they are all 0 280 000 xxx, so only the last 3 digits distinguish them)

re: california vs federal, there should be an emissions control sticker under the hood that says whether its 49 state or 50 state (California approved).

does your car have an EGR valve? afaik, california turbos all have EGR valves, so you'd see the EGR pipe coming off the exhaust side of the turbo, and going around behind the block, also see the EGR vacuum modulator, near the power steering reservoir.
Oh damn! according to that list there's a ton of compatible ECUS for my 740. I'm pretty sure mine's the 49 state version. I'm not sure about the EGR pipes, I'll take pictures and post in the morning. Why do you ask? Would having EGR valves or pipes factor into which ECU I need or why I'm running rich?
 
  #25  
Old 02-12-2015, 09:53 PM
TIPSP's Avatar
Got Boost?
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I run the newer ECU from the 940 on my 91 740 turbo.

Its a 939. It has a fast processer in it and I feel it runs slightly better.
 
  #26  
Old 02-13-2015, 01:38 AM
joshfrigmont's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TIPSP
I run the newer ECU from the 940 on my 91 740 turbo.

Its a 939. It has a fast processer in it and I feel it runs slightly better.
That's good to know!
I'm sure I'll find something at pick and pull tomorrow since the list of substitutes is relatively huge.
 
  #27  
Old 02-14-2015, 01:09 PM
joshfrigmont's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The ECU was the problem the whole time! The only Turbo at the Junk Yard was a 91 940. Just like TIPSP I popped in a 939 ECU. Finally, no more god damn error codes! I pulled the MAF plug and started it just to make sure the CE capable of coming on if something was wrong. sure enough it did! The car sounds like a dream now!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
qstyle
Volvo 240, 740 & 940
6
05-26-2015 04:01 PM
halo2maniak
Volvo S40
1
11-15-2008 08:28 AM
Lichty17
Volvo 850
1
10-21-2006 11:24 PM
Majki
Volvo S80
3
09-21-2005 01:10 AM



Quick Reply: 1990 Volvo Rich Fuel Mixture



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 PM.