Volvo S60 & V60 The mid level Volvo sedan and wagon that offer power, performance and an exciting ride.

Unleaded or Premium Fuel? (USA)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 01-24-2017, 10:58 AM
firebirdparts's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Kingsport, TN
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

I got a question about this. If you had a car that didn't run very well on 87 octane, what would you suspect? I have one like that, and it's a lo-po non-turbo. I guess I need to hook up the scan tool and watch the ignition timing just for fun, but I sure wouldn't know what to do about it if it was in fact jumping around. So far I have figured buying premium is easier than trying to diagnose it.
 
  #22  
Old 01-24-2017, 11:27 AM
mt6127's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 9,283
Received 493 Likes on 474 Posts
Default

it would be interesting to see the scan tool results on the ignition timing for 87 vs 93. If you think about what generally can cause pinking, theres- a lot of factors which can lead to unburnt fuel which can cause the problem... weak spark? intake system (air leaks, dirty MAF/ idle valve/ throttle body), carbon build up on pistons etc? I guess this is why Seafoam and other detergent treatments draw interest.
 
  #23  
Old 01-24-2017, 12:25 PM
firebirdparts's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Kingsport, TN
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Oddly enough, the car died on the road just today, runs fine with the MAF unplugged. So we'll see if another MAF helps it. Carbon buildup makes sense too.
 
  #24  
Old 01-25-2017, 01:27 PM
pauljordantx's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mt6127
anecdotal evidence is not the same as science (correlation vs root cause). Sure some cars may run better on premium but that may actually be pointing to some other issues like a marginal state of tune like weak spark (look at all the threads where somebody reported dropping in new coils or plugs remarking "and the car is running like new"). There is a difference in the fuel's energy density (which is why diesels get higher mileage) but that is mostly due to the percentage of ethanol. Even "winter" fuels with up to 10% ethanol have only a 2% difference vs 100% gasoline or about .5 MPG. I do notice a difference summer to winter of 1-2 MPGs in my 850T, but I attribute much of that to temperature (parasitic losses not engine efficiency) and winter gas (that .5 MPG). I've run 87 and 93 and can only conclude the extra WOT power you get from 93 influences the driver's style not the car's performance.
My opinion, which is loosely based on my anecdotal experience, agrees with the conclusion posited above. Higher octane appears to positively affect throttle response with a turbocharged engine, which in turn can influence the driver to more liberally apply the throttle. So I've actually observed an inverse relationship between octane and MPG.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jleite
Volvo XC60
0
12-03-2015 11:06 PM
1963
Volvo S40
5
07-26-2011 11:25 AM
bartboy9891
Volvo S60 & V60
8
05-30-2008 07:52 AM
pawel
Volvo 260, 760 & 960
20
12-29-2007 11:14 AM
740man24
Volvo 260, 760 & 960
4
03-22-2007 01:08 AM



Quick Reply: Unleaded or Premium Fuel? (USA)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:31 AM.