Turbo's as opposed to fuel economy and engine wear.
#3
RE: Turbo's as opposed to fuel economy and engine wear.
That's only half true... there are plenty of cases where a turbocharged variant of an engine get's better gas milage than it's NA twin. Most Turbo-diesel trucks get better gas milage than non-turbo versions. Even old Turbo-diesel volvos average a better fuel economy than the NA diesels. My friends HIGHLY modified (t3/t4 50trim, biggie fuel system, huge FMIC) gets 47mpg in mixed driving conditions.
#4
RE: Turbo's as opposed to fuel economy and engine wear.
I agree with alecw81. I drive a C-70 with the high pressure turbo. I run Continental Conti Contacts 215 55 16 @ 32psi.. In addition I use Bosch platinum plugs gapped a tad wider than stock. Castrol synthetic oil in the crank case. At an indicated 75 MPH I recently obtained better than 30 MPG. That's not bad for a heavy auto!
#5
#7
RE: Turbo's as opposed to fuel economy and engine wear.
For better than 20 years I have used Bosch platinum plugs. I have them currently in German, Swedish, Japanese, and British autos. After running SCCA events with a Hartge BMW and using literally every plug known to mankind I can speak with authority regarding Bosch platinum plugs. The mistake many make with them is gapping them to factory specs.................
#9
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bowlerhat
Volvo 240, 740 & 940
1
04-04-2010 09:37 PM
consume, engine, engines, fuel, high, increase, pressure, problems, recommended, turbo, turbocharged, turbocharger, turbocharging, turbos, volvo, wear