Lowered 1990 240 problems
#1
Lowered 1990 240 problems
So me and my dad slapped some B&G 1.6(more like2) ince drop springs on my 240. On the rear, the passenger side does not sit nearly as low as the driver side. It looks like it's at stock height and there is a noticeable lean to the car. Does anyone know why this would happen? We check everthever and didn't see an issue mechanically with the install we did. Are we missing something????
#2
#3
How so? We though of that but we didnt think lowering it 2'' would require one. Also, I don't understand how it would lift up one side of the car. I understand pushing the car out of alignment but how does that affect the suspension? We are going to order one come payday and throw it on in hopes that it's the issue. I was just hoping it was a cheaper fix so I dont have to spend $100 more dollars XD
#4
here's the rear end of a 740 wagon, a 240 is very similar. in this picture, the suspension is fully extended downwards as the chassis has been lifted by the body.
240's have different trailing arm bushings, different thrust arms (740/940 has a pair top and bottom, while 240 has them left and right)
the panhard rod is that diagonal strut you see from the right side of the differential to the left side of the chassis. as the differential goes up, the radius of that rod is going to push the differential over to the right. when you lower the car, you're effectively raising the differential higher up than its normal resting position, so it will move even farther to the right. its possible this puts enough of a 'twist' on the trailing arms and springs to cause things to be uneven, I dunno.
the other possibility is mismatched springs, or spring pads... you did replace the spring pads, right? or a antisway bar thats binding or bent ?
240's have different trailing arm bushings, different thrust arms (740/940 has a pair top and bottom, while 240 has them left and right)
the panhard rod is that diagonal strut you see from the right side of the differential to the left side of the chassis. as the differential goes up, the radius of that rod is going to push the differential over to the right. when you lower the car, you're effectively raising the differential higher up than its normal resting position, so it will move even farther to the right. its possible this puts enough of a 'twist' on the trailing arms and springs to cause things to be uneven, I dunno.
the other possibility is mismatched springs, or spring pads... you did replace the spring pads, right? or a antisway bar thats binding or bent ?
#5
here's the rear end of a 740 wagon, a 240 is very similar. in this picture, the suspension is fully extended downwards as the chassis has been lifted by the body.
240's have different trailing arm bushings, different thrust arms (740/940 has a pair top and bottom, while 240 has them left and right)
the panhard rod is that diagonal strut you see from the right side of the differential to the left side of the chassis. as the differential goes up, the radius of that rod is going to push the differential over to the right. when you lower the car, you're effectively raising the differential higher up than its normal resting position, so it will move even farther to the right. its possible this puts enough of a 'twist' on the trailing arms and springs to cause things to be uneven, I dunno.
the other possibility is mismatched springs, or spring pads... you did replace the spring pads, right? or a antisway bar thats binding or bent ?
240's have different trailing arm bushings, different thrust arms (740/940 has a pair top and bottom, while 240 has them left and right)
the panhard rod is that diagonal strut you see from the right side of the differential to the left side of the chassis. as the differential goes up, the radius of that rod is going to push the differential over to the right. when you lower the car, you're effectively raising the differential higher up than its normal resting position, so it will move even farther to the right. its possible this puts enough of a 'twist' on the trailing arms and springs to cause things to be uneven, I dunno.
the other possibility is mismatched springs, or spring pads... you did replace the spring pads, right? or a antisway bar thats binding or bent ?
#6
So me and my dad slapped some B&G 1.6(more like2) ince drop springs on my 240. On the rear, the passenger side does not sit nearly as low as the driver side. It looks like it's at stock height and there is a noticeable lean to the car. Does anyone know why this would happen? We check everthever and didn't see an issue mechanically with the install we did. Are we missing something????
#7
So me and my dad slapped some B&G 1.6(more like2) ince drop springs on my 240. On the rear, the passenger side does not sit nearly as low as the driver side. It looks like it's at stock height and there is a noticeable lean to the car. Does anyone know why this would happen? We check everthever and didn't see an issue mechanically with the install we did. Are we missing something????
#8
Definitely not the shocks, they're brand new, less than 1000 miles on them.
#9
Never changed them, and that wouldn't affect ride height. We swapped springs and there's still a noticeable difference (around 3/4 inch difference). Drove it up the street and back down and it didn't change. We're gonna get new wheels and then see aboia getting a new panhard rod. Hopefully that's the issue.
#10
Never changed them, and that wouldn't affect ride height. We swapped springs and there's still a noticeable difference (around 3/4 inch difference). Drove it up the street and back down and it didn't change. We're gonna get new wheels and then see aboia getting a new panhard rod. Hopefully that's the issue.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post