Front suspension too soft?
So I recently got a 1995 960
Very well maintained, all the service, one oner that sort of thing.
its got 119,000 miles on it at this point
in running 215/55/R16 tires
The smaller problem I am having is that going over medium sized dips or bumps the tires rub. I know they are a little wider than stock, but thats what I had (the old ones were 205/55/R16 so I did not think this would be a problem)
The main problem is that there seems to be excessive front end travel. Its pretty easy to to the "bounce test" on the front and its actually quite stiff on the back side. The car does not bounce much, it will dip once and then level out indication that the struts are probably alright. However the whole front end just feels super soft.
Is this normal, should I change struts, springs, other?
Very well maintained, all the service, one oner that sort of thing.
its got 119,000 miles on it at this point
in running 215/55/R16 tires
The smaller problem I am having is that going over medium sized dips or bumps the tires rub. I know they are a little wider than stock, but thats what I had (the old ones were 205/55/R16 so I did not think this would be a problem)
The main problem is that there seems to be excessive front end travel. Its pretty easy to to the "bounce test" on the front and its actually quite stiff on the back side. The car does not bounce much, it will dip once and then level out indication that the struts are probably alright. However the whole front end just feels super soft.
Is this normal, should I change struts, springs, other?
At this point I have become obsessive with figuring this problem out on a budget, however it looks like I will be doing some front end suspension work. What do you guys think?
If i do the "Bounce test" on the front drivers side strut its super easy and the car dips, however it still levels out fine
The front passenger side however is almost as solid as the rear springs and resists the bounce test a lot, and then levels out fine
Could one bad strut make the whole spring assembly that much softer? I have never changed out a strut, aside for some coil overs so my understanding in this area is limited.
If i do the "Bounce test" on the front drivers side strut its super easy and the car dips, however it still levels out fine
The front passenger side however is almost as solid as the rear springs and resists the bounce test a lot, and then levels out fine
Could one bad strut make the whole spring assembly that much softer? I have never changed out a strut, aside for some coil overs so my understanding in this area is limited.
Think about how a strut works - the shock part of the strut is responsible for the "bounce" and the spring part is responsible for how the car sits. My money says your strut is shot. Hit a wrecking yard if you want to save.
That will be it then, I will replace the shocks. While I am in there would it be a good idea to replace the springs with some heavier ones, or is stock pretty much the best option on these older cars?
I have heard that the dealer shocks say MONROE on them. I also heard that the shocks that Monroe sell on the aftermarket are made in Europe (was it Spain?). I haven't seen any other aftermarket ones - pity, 'coz i've got Bilstein HD on all my other cars and like them so much.
I have heard that the dealer shocks say MONROE on them. I also heard that the shocks that Monroe sell on the aftermarket are made in Europe (was it Spain?). I haven't seen any other aftermarket ones - pity, 'coz i've got Bilstein HD on all my other cars and like them so much.
Unfortunately Bilstein list nothing for this car last I checked
options seem to be dealer, or monroe.
Rockauto have the Monroe parts.
Rear OE seem to be Sachs. I don't know what to do if you have the "Nivomat" in the rear. I think you would only find this on certain wagons though.
Also did not notice that you went "a size larger" on the tires. I really can't believe that +1cm width will cause a problem, or the associated diameter increase keeping the 55 profile. Our sedan has factory original shocks, and we acquired it with 205/60/16, and was not a problem.
options seem to be dealer, or monroe.Rockauto have the Monroe parts.
Rear OE seem to be Sachs. I don't know what to do if you have the "Nivomat" in the rear. I think you would only find this on certain wagons though.
Also did not notice that you went "a size larger" on the tires. I really can't believe that +1cm width will cause a problem, or the associated diameter increase keeping the 55 profile. Our sedan has factory original shocks, and we acquired it with 205/60/16, and was not a problem.
Last edited by VDonkey; Apr 12, 2015 at 01:20 AM.
Unfortunately Bilstein list nothing for this car last I checked
options seem to be dealer, or monroe.
Rockauto have the Monroe parts.
Rear OE seem to be Sachs. I don't know what to do if you have the "Nivomat" in the rear. I think you would only find this on certain wagons though.
Also did not notice that you went "a size larger" on the tires. I really can't believe that +1cm width will cause a problem, or the associated diameter increase keeping the 55 profile. Our sedan has factory original shocks, and we acquired it with 205/60/16, and was not a problem.
options seem to be dealer, or monroe.Rockauto have the Monroe parts.
Rear OE seem to be Sachs. I don't know what to do if you have the "Nivomat" in the rear. I think you would only find this on certain wagons though.
Also did not notice that you went "a size larger" on the tires. I really can't believe that +1cm width will cause a problem, or the associated diameter increase keeping the 55 profile. Our sedan has factory original shocks, and we acquired it with 205/60/16, and was not a problem.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



