Hho ?
#1
03-11-2011, 02:55 PM
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#5
03-13-2011, 08:38 PM
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
03-13-2011, 08:44 PM
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HHO works
#7
03-13-2011, 09:00 PM
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#9
03-13-2011, 09:20 PM
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#10
03-13-2011, 09:25 PM
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#12
03-14-2011, 12:25 AM
google HHO:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxyhydrogen
bunk.
From above link:
Fringe science and fraud
Oxyhydrogen is often mentioned in conjunction with devices that claim to operate a vehicle using water as a fuel, or that burn the gas in torches for welding and cutting at extreme temperatures. Oxyhydrogen is sometimes referred as "Brown's Gas" after Yull Brown who advocated such devices, or "HHO gas" after the claims of fringe physicist Ruggero Santilli.
The most common and decisive counter-argument against using the gas as a fuel is that the energy required to split water molecules exceeds the energy recouped by burning it, and these devices reduce, rather than improve fuel efficiency.[12]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxyhydrogen
bunk.
From above link:
Fringe science and fraud
Oxyhydrogen is often mentioned in conjunction with devices that claim to operate a vehicle using water as a fuel, or that burn the gas in torches for welding and cutting at extreme temperatures. Oxyhydrogen is sometimes referred as "Brown's Gas" after Yull Brown who advocated such devices, or "HHO gas" after the claims of fringe physicist Ruggero Santilli.
The most common and decisive counter-argument against using the gas as a fuel is that the energy required to split water molecules exceeds the energy recouped by burning it, and these devices reduce, rather than improve fuel efficiency.[12]
#13
03-14-2011, 01:12 AM
It goes like this: someone puts out there that it works. Mythbusters tests it and proves it DOESNT work, then the snake oil salesmen come out and say "no wait, it didnt work for you because you did it wrong...."
This is not a difficult concept to grasp. of COURSE the people who favor it are gonna say they did it wrong. Ask yourself this: who stands to make money by it being proven bunk? the guys on mythbusters? doubtful. The people who are trying top push the technology? nope, they want you to believe it works so they can sell you plans on how to build it.
Hey hookus? if you're interested, I can send you some information on how to become a millionaire overnight. Just send me a self-addressed stamped envelope, along with your low one-time payment of $99.99, and I will send it out to you.
This is not a difficult concept to grasp. of COURSE the people who favor it are gonna say they did it wrong. Ask yourself this: who stands to make money by it being proven bunk? the guys on mythbusters? doubtful. The people who are trying top push the technology? nope, they want you to believe it works so they can sell you plans on how to build it.
Hey hookus? if you're interested, I can send you some information on how to become a millionaire overnight. Just send me a self-addressed stamped envelope, along with your low one-time payment of $99.99, and I will send it out to you.
#14
03-14-2011, 10:41 PM
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It goes like this: someone puts out there that it works. Mythbusters tests it and proves it DOESNT work, then the snake oil salesmen come out and say "no wait, it didnt work for you because you did it wrong...."
This is not a difficult concept to grasp. of COURSE the people who favor it are gonna say they did it wrong. Ask yourself this: who stands to make money by it being proven bunk? the guys on mythbusters? doubtful. The people who are trying top push the technology? nope, they want you to believe it works so they can sell you plans on how to build it.
Hey hookus? if you're interested, I can send you some information on how to become a millionaire overnight. Just send me a self-addressed stamped envelope, along with your low one-time payment of $99.99, and I will send it out to you.
This is not a difficult concept to grasp. of COURSE the people who favor it are gonna say they did it wrong. Ask yourself this: who stands to make money by it being proven bunk? the guys on mythbusters? doubtful. The people who are trying top push the technology? nope, they want you to believe it works so they can sell you plans on how to build it.
Hey hookus? if you're interested, I can send you some information on how to become a millionaire overnight. Just send me a self-addressed stamped envelope, along with your low one-time payment of $99.99, and I will send it out to you.
#15
03-14-2011, 11:03 PM
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#16
03-14-2011, 11:45 PM
No, that's old school (2-3 years old LOL). A fooler box is a chip which modifies the fuel trims. It basically fools the ECU into thinking that nothing's changed. It connects to the OBD2 port.
#18
03-15-2011, 10:00 AM
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hello henry
yes i know they are , no i haven't used one . my hho is so far working fine as i said i took a mpg yesterday and gained 10 mpg ,have you heard of GEET ? it won't work on a car but it will power up to a 20 hp motor
#19
03-15-2011, 10:26 AM
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ALL talk no action
WAIT A MINUTE ! Snake oil man ,YOU came here to try to change MY mind ! Right ? i proved to you that Mythbusters had no idea they didn't know what they were doing THEY SAID IT NOT ME ! i thought you said you trusted them ? i guess you don't ?