Volvo 850 Made from 1993 to 1997, this Volvo line was available in both a wagon and a sedan, both with were graced with several trim levels.

N/A -vs- Turbo throttle body

Old Nov 25, 2011 | 12:15 AM
  #21  
rspi's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 15,736
Likes: 36
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by Vmax
In my experience, using E or S mode does not matter if you're full throttle (kickdown). Sport mode only makes the gearbox downshift happy 1/4-3/4 throttle, it does not make the car faster.
I know it made my 960 just a little faster but in my T-5R, it's the difference between having horses and a tiger. When I'm in E my car is not as fast nor strong. It really doesn't even sound the same, seriously. In E it feels like a GLT with less low end torque. In the S mode it feels like the tiger has been let loose. It will jerk you back in your seat. The E compared to the S is like running 3/4 power. I can't even spin tire in E. I'm sure it would be between .8 and 1.2 seconds in the 1/4 mile.

Next time I have the chance to go to a track I will run it in both modes to get good documentation of the difference. I know there is not much difference when just driving around town but when you kick it, you'll know it. Actually I think it shifts a little sooner when driving like an old lady (in S). I recently tested it in E and S, and when driving with a light foot, 22% throttle position while picking up speed, it will shift about 2 to 3 mph sooner in S mode which saves me about 1 to 2 mpg around town. Now when I drive a little more agressive, like 33% or better throttle position, it will shift later like the book says. Most people drive between 30% and 35% throttle while driving around town, I call it racing to the next light.

The T-5R is suppose to run the 1/4 mile in 14.5 seconds stock. The '96 and '97 R is suppose to do the 1/4 mile in 14.7 or 14.8 seconds. With a K & N box filter, synthetic oil, a clean PCV, and 93 Octane, I would think I could do 14.3 or 14.4.

Thanks for clearing up that blue bra thing. I was about to block my PM's for a while.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 07:00 PM
  #22  
clean850R's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 174
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

You have to be careful when posting up the 1/4 mile times for the 96-97 850R. The US market 850R was alot different than the non-US market 850R! The US market had an auto trans and a 15G! The non-US had a new M59 manual trans and a 16T turbo! The non-US market 850R ran a 15.1 stock the US market 850R ran a 16.3 stock!

Now here's the power specs!
US market 96-97 850R.......... 240hp / 220lbft
Non-US market 96-97 850R...... 250hp / 260lbft

So big difference! Translates out to about 1 second on the drag strip!
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 07:42 PM
  #23  
rspi's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 15,736
Likes: 36
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

@ Vmax: Is your car a GLT or T5? Your car my not show a difference but I promise you, there is no placebo with my switch.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 07:59 PM
  #24  
clean850R's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 174
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

Mine too that was one of the things I noticed. With the switch in Eco I also noticed it produces less boost and slower spool! But in sport the boost goes higher and faster! Yes the trans shift points are also different and more sharp!
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2011 | 12:26 AM
  #25  
Vmax's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 752
Likes: 3
From: Palm Springs, FL
Default

Mines a T5, but I never really looked for an acceleration difference between E and S, I just leave mine in S all the time..if I want to save gas, I stay out of boost.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
treestone27
Volvo S80
6
Apr 29, 2014 07:40 AM
Chrispy_T
For Sale / Trade - Archive
2
Feb 18, 2014 11:37 PM
shoeboxOH
2001-2013 model year V70
6
Oct 1, 2013 09:21 AM
ithcy
Volvo V70
2
Oct 18, 2009 12:38 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 PM.