Volvo S70 Made from 1998 to 2000, this sporty model replaced the 850 sedan and instantly became a hit.

Upper Torque Mount

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2014 | 08:41 PM
  #1  
MattLocke's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default Upper Torque Mount

I think its time for me to replace my upper engine mount because there is a good amount of play. What exactly would putting a polyurethane mount in do? And/or what would you guys suggest?
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 08:42 PM
  #2  
rspi's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 15,736
Likes: 36
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Stiffer, easier to replace, last longer.

 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2014 | 07:41 PM
  #3  
weigelbrood's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Default Upper Torque Mount

I just replaced my upper torque mount today. It was pretty simple in my 2003 s60 T4. However, I still have alot of play in the Strut bar mount bracket bushings...sometimes called upper torque rod brackets. I am having trouble finding the brackets/bushings to purchase and replace. Anyone know where I can purchase a set of these?

I purchased a rubber vs. urethane because I read too many bad reviews referring to excessive vibration at idle due to them being denser material and not absorbing enough of the vibrations.

I would be interested to know what you choose.
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2014 | 04:10 AM
  #4  
JamesG's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas USA
Default

Originally Posted by weigelbrood
I just replaced my upper torque mount today. It was pretty simple in my 2003 s60 T4. However, I still have alot of play in the Strut bar mount bracket bushings...sometimes called upper torque rod brackets. I am having trouble finding the brackets/bushings to purchase and replace. Anyone know where I can purchase a set of these?

I purchased a rubber vs. urethane because I read too many bad reviews referring to excessive vibration at idle due to them being denser material and not absorbing enough of the vibrations.

I would be interested to know what you choose.

A certain amount of play is by design to allow the engine to vibrate without restraint. You do not want that rod to be held hard to the strut towers. I doubt that those bushings need replacement.
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2014 | 08:51 AM
  #5  
weigelbrood's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Default Upper Torque Mount

Originally Posted by JamesG
A certain amount of play is by design to allow the engine to vibrate without restraint. You do not want that rod to be held hard to the strut towers. I doubt that those bushings need replacement.
Thanks, James. I will leave it as is. Should all motor mounts be equally as loose?
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 10:53 AM
  #6  
JamesG's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas USA
Default

Mounts will not last forever, but for how long I can't say. I think Volvo uses soft mountings for the 5-cyl engine because that engine has significant vibrations and oscillations due to inherent lack of dynamic balance and the design choice by Volvo of not incorporating balance shafts into the block. The Volvo diesels use vacuum mounts which are soft at idle and stiffen as the rpms increase. The Volvo petrol engines don't use vacuum mounts but at least some years use liquid filled (silicone oil I think) main support mounts which must have a shorter life than solid rubber or elastomer.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balance_shaft.

I am not disagreeing with that decision--that may be entirely reasonable for a 5-cyl engine of 2.4 L displacement, but GM in their Atlas series of 5-cyl engines (much larger than 2.4L) do use balance shafts.


Inline 6-cyl engines have inherently good balance, but inline 4-cyl and 5-cyl, and even V6s and V8s do not. Traditionally 4-cyl engines of displacement greater than 2.0 L are fitted with balance shafts. In the inline 4-cyl the balance shafts are parallel, twin counter rotating at twice the rotation rate of the crankshaft. This internally cancels out the inherent out of balance of the crank and pistons. The vibrations of the inline 5-cyl may not be as easily and as completely rectified by balance shafts as the inline 4-cyl.
 

Last edited by JamesG; Jan 1, 2015 at 11:00 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jg1
Volvo S70
11
Feb 7, 2016 04:26 PM
89bowtie
Volvo C70
2
Nov 3, 2009 12:17 PM
CaliS80T6
Volvo S80
7
Sep 12, 2009 09:20 AM
halcyon419
Volvo V70
14
Mar 24, 2009 11:17 PM
00XC
Volvo XC70
1
Jan 3, 2007 04:09 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 PM.