Volvo 850 Made from 1993 to 1997, this Volvo line was available in both a wagon and a sedan, both with were graced with several trim levels.

1994 850 vs 97

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-26-2009, 09:45 PM
850 fan's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1994 850 vs 97

I am a big Volvo fan and have been looking for good Volvo 850 to buy. There is a 1994 Turbo and a 1997 also turbo both have around 280 000 km.

Which do you guys think would be better I am wondering which would have less problems because I heard that for these Volvos that 1994s had less problems 1997s.

Also If I do buy one of them what parts do you think should I look at replacing at 280 000. The body of both vehicles is in excellent shape.

Thanks for your Help
 
  #2  
Old 09-26-2009, 09:59 PM
silkhope's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 94 turbo and love it. You should do the timing belt and tensioner's, if they have not been done as required. Change out the PVC system also if you can not verify when it was done. Finally do a compression test on both, this should give you a good idea of the engine internals. Good luck
 
  #3  
Old 09-27-2009, 07:55 AM
JPN's Avatar
JPN
JPN is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: IPS, MA
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I would go for somewhere in the middle; '95 T5-R.

The biggest advantage of 1994 model is that you can retrieve fault code from the ECU without any special equipment, whereas 1997 models require OBD-II scanner and many generic scanners (non-Volvo) cannot access certain systems.

So, if you want to troubleshoot electronic control problems by yourself, go for the '94. If not, '97 would be your choice.

One note: '94 models are showing age, and you would have to spend quite a bit of money to make it in good condition (I would spend $2,000-$3,000 to make it as good as semi-new, and for most people the car is not worth spending that kind of money).

The following thread would tell you as to what to expect in maintenance.
https://volvoforums.com/forum/volvo-850-16/new-volvo-850-owners-read-important-thread-also-applies-s-v70s-9266/

Read a few more replies if you can wait.


JPN
 
  #4  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:02 AM
Psaboic's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SW, WA
Posts: 2,520
Received 34 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Like JPN said, they are all the same model and except for a few cosmetic differences, they are basically the same car. However, for me, the big difference was the fact that up until the 1996 models, you can retrieve the ECU fault codes easily. We have a 95 Turbo for our kids with 203,000 miles on it and over the past 4 years of owning it I have put about 2K into it fixing it up a bit. (tires, struts, timing belt, tensioners, etc...)
 
  #5  
Old 09-28-2009, 09:23 AM
fcpgroton's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would also go with the 94 over the 97. Mainly because you can get the fault codes out of the 94. I have a 94 850 myself and with 193K on the clock, it is still running strong.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
debcosta
Volvo 850
1
11-27-2005 08:42 PM
causeyvoh
Volvo 850
6
09-18-2005 03:05 PM
giddingsw
New Members Area
0
08-11-2005 02:00 PM
miami_twice
New Members Area
0
11-13-2003 03:15 PM



Quick Reply: 1994 850 vs 97



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM.