Volvo 850 Made from 1993 to 1997, this Volvo line was available in both a wagon and a sedan, both with were graced with several trim levels.

850 engines?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 28, 2011 | 10:29 PM
  #1  
bob330's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default 850 engines?

Does anyone know the issues with replacing a 1994 turbo 850 engine with a non-turbo engine, also from a 1994 850? Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2011 | 10:37 PM
  #2  
MattyXXL's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Are you planning to keep the turbo in the car?
If so I believe the turbo block has piston cooling jets and the N/A doesnt or something like that.
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2011 | 11:00 PM
  #3  
91shelby's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 854
Likes: 1
From: Poulsbo Washington
Default

compression is 10.5:1 on the NA and 8.5:1 on the turbo. are you swapping in the NA or the bottom end ? or whats your idea?
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2011 | 11:33 PM
  #4  
Buffalobeans's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Salt lake city utah
Default

Oil jets(oil squirters cooling jets) aren't the big issue in Dsm's the car performs better without them. The big issue is compression ratios like stated above if you put a NA in it keep it NA unless you build it and build it properly
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 12:03 AM
  #5  
91shelby's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 854
Likes: 1
From: Poulsbo Washington
Default

Originally Posted by Buffalobeans
Oil jets(oil squirters cooling jets) aren't the big issue in Dsm's the car performs better without them. The big issue is compression ratios like stated above if you put a NA in it keep it NA unless you build it and build it properly
The oil cooling jets doesnt affect the performance really at all, though they help the engine last longer. and the NA doesn't have them and the Turbo does. Though i dont think the LPT engines had cooling jets
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 12:47 AM
  #6  
trs80's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default

ECU needs to be from NA motor.

My 2 cents: cooling jets > no cooling jets.
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 01:03 AM
  #7  
Buffalobeans's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Salt lake city utah
Default

I know what there for and reasoning for them. I really don't think the LPT engines have them either. Also yes the ecu needs to be from a NA motor. In the end your best option remains a turbo engine less to worry about drop it in and go on with life
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 07:00 AM
  #8  
bob330's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks everyone for weighing in on this. I am wanting to pull the whole non-turbo engine from one 850 and drop it into a different 850 that is a turbo...but it's engine is bad, if this is possible.
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 07:03 AM
  #9  
bob330's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

...also the turbo would be eliminated, just want to know if all should match up and function happily as a non-turbo car.
 

Last edited by bob330; Jun 29, 2011 at 07:06 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 07:40 AM
  #10  
gilber33's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,948
Likes: 3
From: Milwaukee, WI
Default

I think if you try and do that, you will run into more problems that you thought. Different computer and main wire harnesses for starters.
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 08:37 AM
  #11  
bob330's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Is it too crazy to swap the computer and wire harnesses, etc. over with the engine?
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 12:44 PM
  #12  
gilber33's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,948
Likes: 3
From: Milwaukee, WI
Default

Originally Posted by bob330
Is it too crazy to swap the computer and wire harnesses, etc. over with the engine?
No. Have you ever done something like that? I don't get it, your doing SSSSOOOOOO much extra work than necessary if you just put in a turbo engine. Don't forget there's difference exhaust manifolds, so you'll have to get a custom downpipe and exhaust work done. FCP shows different part numbers between radiators, so you'll need a different radiator. You'll need a different intake.

Someone tried to do an NA to turbo swap, and about three months in, he gave up because the car just wouldn't run right. You're going to have the same issues if you attempt this if you've never done something like this before.

For all I know you're a professional mechanic, however, based on the fact that you don't know much about the two different engines, you've never done anything with these cars before, in that case, you would be way over your head.

Also, the fueling system may be different, it was for him. He had to go to a junkyard and take the entire fueling system from a turbo car, you will probably have to get the entire fueling system from an NA. IMO, you may attempt it, you'll get finished, and the car won't run, and if it does, it will barely run.

My 2 cents.
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 01:33 PM
  #13  
trs80's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default

The only way I would swap an engine of different design is if I had the entire front half of the car Im swapping from.
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 01:36 PM
  #14  
bob330's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for the straightforward insights, it's what I needed to know. I just happen to have the engine available, but will keep it where it is. I do appreciate everyones generous thought. I'll go look for an engine!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ogotaj
Volvo 240, 740 & 940
2
Mar 22, 2008 02:57 AM
PANTYEATR
General Volvo Chat
2
Jan 17, 2008 12:22 AM
led.noquarter
Volvo 240, 740 & 940
1
Mar 19, 2007 10:25 PM
cosmiclobster
Volvo 260, 760 & 960
1
Aug 2, 2006 10:22 PM
KINGI5T850
Volvo 850
2
Apr 4, 2006 11:45 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 PM.