Volvo S40 The S40 is Volvo's most affordable sedan with all the amenities of a luxury sports car.

How long should OEM tires last

Old Aug 30, 2010 | 09:44 AM
  #1  
hammer1234's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Default How long should OEM tires last

Just wondering...on a 2009 S40, if most of the driving is highway commutes with some stop and go, how many miles should I expect to get out of the OEM tires? Also, which brakes tend to wear out first, the fronts or the rears?
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2010 | 07:46 PM
  #2  
Bobec's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: Sebastian, FLA
Default

Front brakes wear out first, the weight of the vehicle is transfered to the front during braking and so the front wears out fastest.

From what I understand about OEM tires, they wear faster than any other tire. Why? they expect every under educated(tire wise that is) to go to the tire store and purchase the same great tire. and this is where they start to make their money. When you have a car manufacturer that has huge volume you have to give them the very best price to keep the factory running. This doesn't mean you have to give them the longest lasting tire. Who knows???
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2010 | 10:54 PM
  #3  
AutoNaut's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 750
Likes: 3
From: MD
Default

Actually on these cars the rear brakes go first. The braking system is biased to the rear. You can expect about 30 - 40K miles out of the rear pads and the rotors are usually ready to be replaced at the 2nd pad change on the rears.

Depending on how much camber you have on the rear wheels, you can expect about 30K out of the original tires. There are better tires out there even from the same tire company.
Stan
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 07:09 AM
  #4  
SVTfocusO3's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 754
Likes: 2
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by AutoNaut
Actually on these cars the rear brakes go first. The braking system is biased to the rear. You can expect about 30 - 40K miles out of the rear pads and the rotors are usually ready to be replaced at the 2nd pad change on the rears.

Depending on how much camber you have on the rear wheels, you can expect about 30K out of the original tires. There are better tires out there even from the same tire company.
Stan


ditto


bobec, you must be on those p2 cars...
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 01:54 PM
  #5  
hammer1234's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by AutoNaut
Actually on these cars the rear brakes go first. The braking system is biased to the rear. You can expect about 30 - 40K miles out of the rear pads and the rotors are usually ready to be replaced at the 2nd pad change on the rears.

Depending on how much camber you have on the rear wheels, you can expect about 30K out of the original tires. There are better tires out there even from the same tire company.
Stan
I was wondering about that...I see more brake dust on the rear wheels than the front. Will be interesting to see what the wear is at the next service visit. Most of my driving is highway commuting in the Boston area...get my share of high speed stops because of the way people drive around here.

Hoping to get quieter tires the next time around...the OEM tires are also not the greatest in the snow.
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 10:05 PM
  #6  
AutoNaut's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 750
Likes: 3
From: MD
Default

For all season tires I am very pleased with the Michelin Pilot Exalto A/S. The seem to do everything fairly well. To do better I think you would have to go with a set of summer and a set of winter tires.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 04:52 AM
  #7  
rolotamossy's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From:
Default

My OEM Michelins (17") lasted just a little more than 2 years. Not great in terms of life expectancy, but it's not because Michelins suck or because Volvo tried to outfit my vehicle with subpar tires. It's because these Michelins were awesome.

Usually the better the tire (better grip, better handling, less noise), the shorter their lifespan. Tires that last longer tend to be harder, stiffer, and noisier.

I ended up replacing the Michelins with a set of Yokohamas, which are cheaper and don't offer the same ride quality (both in terms of speed and comfortability) but are so far good and will hopefully last a year or so longer. They were an "all-around middle ground" selection that I've been pleased with so far.
 
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2010 | 11:51 AM
  #8  
Tango's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: N/E PA
Default

2006 S40 T5 AWD, original Michelins 52,000 miles. Rear brakes dealer said will need replacing at 60,000 service. Fronts still looked good. Replaced tires with Michelin Hydro Edge Green X. Love them! Awesome handling in rain, and dry roads. Tom
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redbandit850
Nitrous, Super Chargers, & Turbos
21
Nov 15, 2019 09:07 PM
madymo3d
Volvo S60 & V60
3
Jul 29, 2014 10:33 AM
PieceKeeper
Volvo S80
7
Jan 11, 2013 09:42 AM
CPC
Volvo S60 & V60
0
Mar 14, 2007 02:36 AM
TexasProud
Volvo 850
9
Dec 3, 2004 03:37 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 AM.