AC question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 21, 2011 | 07:36 PM
  #21  
Volvohayden's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Default

thanks for the replies, wow jagtoes that sounds like a very costly venture as is a lot of work. For now I think I am going to leave it the way it is since I am thinking about buying a 850 turbo and do not want to put a bunch of money into my 740, the ac works so at least its better than nada.
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2011 | 07:45 PM
  #22  
zloetakoe's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

bump, just wondering if anyone knows approx how much r12 to buy. Found a guy near me that is selling it cheap. I'd like to know how much to get from him.
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2011 | 07:47 PM
  #23  
dezertsub's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Crap, I've got r12 coming out of my ears. 30 lb. cylinders. My pops was an HVAC tech for Sears back when r12 was used. Willing to sell, PM for details.
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2011 | 08:23 PM
  #24  
pierce's Avatar
no mo volvo
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 11,289
Likes: 109
From: 37 North on the left coast
Default

Originally Posted by Volvohayden
thanks for the replies, wow jagtoes that sounds like a very costly venture as is a lot of work. For now I think I am going to leave it the way it is since I am thinking about buying a 850 turbo and do not want to put a bunch of money into my 740, the ac works so at least its better than nada.
odd, I'm selling my 850 turbo and putting a bunch of money into my 740. hah.

850 cons: crappy harsh ride yet doesn't handle that great. rattles and squeaks all over the car on rough roads. lousy ground clearance. lousy turning radius. cramped interior. expensive to repair engine. too easy to spin front wheels.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2011 | 09:45 AM
  #25  
jagtoes's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 14
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by Volvohayden
thanks for the replies, wow jagtoes that sounds like a very costly venture as is a lot of work. For now I think I am going to leave it the way it is since I am thinking about buying a 850 turbo and do not want to put a bunch of money into my 740, the ac works so at least its better than nada.
Well it's my wife's 1st and only new car. She has 315K miles on it and wants to hit 1M. It looks good and runs OK so we just keep it going. As to cost I guess it is relative. A few hundred to fix it is a cheap investment to keep her happy.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2011 | 12:09 PM
  #26  
dezertsub's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by jagtoes
As to cost I guess it is relative. A few hundred to fix it is a cheap investment to keep her happy.
And this my friends, is priceless. LMAO!
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2011 | 07:30 PM
  #27  
Volvohayden's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pierce
odd, I'm selling my 850 turbo and putting a bunch of money into my 740. hah.

850 cons: crappy harsh ride yet doesn't handle that great. rattles and squeaks all over the car on rough roads. lousy ground clearance. lousy turning radius. cramped interior. expensive to repair engine. too easy to spin front wheels.
Hmm maybe I should rethink this strategy, What 740 comes with 16 Valve turbo factory
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2011 | 07:31 PM
  #28  
Volvohayden's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jagtoes
Well it's my wife's 1st and only new car. She has 315K miles on it and wants to hit 1M. It looks good and runs OK so we just keep it going. As to cost I guess it is relative. A few hundred to fix it is a cheap investment to keep her happy.
Well if there is one thing for certain you have to keep the wife happy. LOL
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2011 | 07:42 PM
  #29  
VileSmile's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Default

Canadian, Gonna jump in here.

I know here, we have a product called RED-TEK. It's dirt cheap, and acts as a suitable R12 and R134A substitute, however it doesnt last as long as either (Maybe a year, tops). If your system is completly empty, even a novice can fill it.

It might be worth a shot.



Ignore the 'Just empty your system' comment. I wouldnt recommend 'just' doing that haha.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2011 | 08:07 PM
  #30  
pierce's Avatar
no mo volvo
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 11,289
Likes: 109
From: 37 North on the left coast
Default

Originally Posted by Volvohayden
Hmm maybe I should rethink this strategy, What 740 comes with 16 Valve turbo factory
none. the 16V motors were non-turbo. afaik, the B234F 16V DOHC motor only came on 940's, starting in 92 or 93 (but someone will probably correct me[1]). The turbos were all b230ft, which are SOHC 8 valves. Note that the 740 and 940 are almost identical cars. The 940 sedan has a taller trunk lid and a higher rear seat back. The wagons are spitting images of each other, especailly the last 2 years of the 740 that overlapped with the 940. IMHO, the optimal car is a 94/95 940T wagon, as that engine has some internal improvements including oil squirters (and I'm a wagon-head).

I've heard of folks retrofitting B230FT turbos with the 16V head, but I think there's more low hanging fruit to get more power (see the stickies in this forum, and on turbobricks). But, frankly, its powerful enough for me as-is.

the 16V head has a downside, its an interference engine, if you ever break a timing belt, you'll almost for sure bend/break valves. Also, the 16V develops its horsepower at a higher RPM, so is normally mated with a lower gearbox.



[1] ok, I'll correct myself. VADIS lists the 89 and 90 740 as having the B234F as an option. It was not available on the 91-92 740, just on the 91-92 940, and not at all on the 93-95 940. In fact, a 91-92 940 non-turbo just about has to be a 16V according to what I'm seeing. Note, this is purely for US models, in other countries there were undoubtedly other options.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2011 | 08:21 PM
  #31  
Volvohayden's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Default

wow thats alot of info so If i want turbo in a 4 door I should go with an 8 Valve 740 GLE correct?
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2011 | 08:39 PM
  #32  
pierce's Avatar
no mo volvo
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 11,289
Likes: 109
From: 37 North on the left coast
Default

I'm pretty sure if a 740 has a turbo, its called a 740 Turbo. only on the later 940s did they put turbos in models that didn't say turbo on the back.

By the time my 92 wagon was made, they dropped the GL/GLE stuff and it JUST says 740 Turbo on it. in 91/92, the 740s were more of a base model, while the 940s were a little more upscale, for instance, my 740 has no cruise control, it has manual a/c controls, it has manual seats, however it does have a sunroof and leather (both were optional).



a sedan is really a 744 or 944, (and a wagon is a 745 or 945) but they didn't put that on the back of them, only on the serial number plate under the hood.

early 740 sedan



later 740 sedan (note the different lights)


940 sedan (note the taller, rounded trunk line)



other than the cosmetic differences, the chassis was basically the same, later years had incremental engineering improvements.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2011 | 08:48 PM
  #33  
Volvohayden's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Default

Very Interesting my 90 740 is a GL and it has leather and a sunroof(that dosent work) but also manual seats and no cruise No cruise but leather heated seats go figure
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
96850urbo
Volvo 850
9
Jan 23, 2009 01:00 PM
Adrenalin540
Volvo 850
8
Dec 31, 2008 10:19 AM
Aaronius
Volvo S40
1
May 30, 2008 06:10 PM
pvolvoman
Volvo 850
9
Oct 24, 2007 07:29 PM
mordezmoncou
Volvo 850
1
Apr 9, 2007 05:22 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 AM.