Original B21F instead of later installed B230

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-06-2018, 02:52 AM
Tal Glazer's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Original B21F instead of B230?

Hi,
I have a '79 California 245 which originally had the 2.1 K-Jet.
The previous owner probably had that die on him and replaced it with a B230.
I'm wondering if i will earn double kudos if i refit a B21F for both originality AND (maybe) better performance+fuel efficiency (?).
Some people say the B230 with the carb is simply a better, more reliable engine....
Thoughts?
 

Last edited by Tal Glazer; 10-06-2018 at 11:04 AM. Reason: Confusing
  #2  
Old 10-06-2018, 02:05 PM
pierce's Avatar
no mo volvo
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 37 North on the left coast
Posts: 11,289
Received 101 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

b230f with LH2.2/2.4 is more efficient than anything with carbs.

kjet is fine when it works, but getting harder and harder to find parts for when it doesn't. weren't the B21F's counterflow motors ? (exhaust and intake on same side of head) ... I know the B230 is crossflow (intake on left side of car, exhaust on right), so swapping between these requires significant routing work.

unluckily, if you're in california, anything 1975 or newer requires smog tests, and engine replacements have to be inspected by a BAR referee, if you install a newer engine, you have to install all the engine management that came with the year of the newer engine, and it has to meet that newer year's smog requirements.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
81 Brick
Volvo 240, 740 & 940
1
03-24-2019 12:41 PM
cornholio
Volvo 240, 740 & 940
3
05-18-2013 02:54 PM
alanwjack
All Other Volvo's
0
05-18-2009 11:07 AM
mhfowle
Volvo 240, 740 & 940
0
02-15-2009 03:16 PM
special k
Intake, Headers and Exhaust
1
12-23-2008 07:29 PM



Quick Reply: Original B21F instead of later installed B230



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 AM.