Original B21F instead of later installed B230

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2018 | 02:52 AM
  #1  
Tal Glazer's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default Original B21F instead of B230?

Hi,
I have a '79 California 245 which originally had the 2.1 K-Jet.
The previous owner probably had that die on him and replaced it with a B230.
I'm wondering if i will earn double kudos if i refit a B21F for both originality AND (maybe) better performance+fuel efficiency (?).
Some people say the B230 with the carb is simply a better, more reliable engine....
Thoughts?
 

Last edited by Tal Glazer; Oct 6, 2018 at 11:04 AM. Reason: Confusing
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2018 | 02:05 PM
  #2  
pierce's Avatar
no mo volvo
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 11,289
Likes: 109
From: 37 North on the left coast
Default

b230f with LH2.2/2.4 is more efficient than anything with carbs.

kjet is fine when it works, but getting harder and harder to find parts for when it doesn't. weren't the B21F's counterflow motors ? (exhaust and intake on same side of head) ... I know the B230 is crossflow (intake on left side of car, exhaust on right), so swapping between these requires significant routing work.

unluckily, if you're in california, anything 1975 or newer requires smog tests, and engine replacements have to be inspected by a BAR referee, if you install a newer engine, you have to install all the engine management that came with the year of the newer engine, and it has to meet that newer year's smog requirements.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
81 Brick
Volvo 240, 740 & 940
1
Mar 24, 2019 12:41 PM
cornholio
Volvo 240, 740 & 940
3
May 18, 2013 02:54 PM
alanwjack
All Other Volvo's
0
May 18, 2009 11:07 AM
mhfowle
Volvo 240, 740 & 940
0
Feb 15, 2009 03:16 PM
special k
Intake, Headers and Exhaust
1
Dec 23, 2008 07:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 AM.