View Poll Results: A poll
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll
What is your city gas mileage
#1
What is your city gas mileage
Since we have got old beauties, just wanted to know much gas they are consuming. The results can be consolidated and one of the mods might be able to share some tips on how to get a better mileage.
I get 17 mpg for 1991 SW 740 In city, and 20 mpg on freeway.
What is your city gas mileage?
Edit
It seems that poll does not work. So please reply to this thread. Include your model number, year and your gas mileage.
I get 17 mpg for 1991 SW 740 In city, and 20 mpg on freeway.
What is your city gas mileage?
Edit
It seems that poll does not work. So please reply to this thread. Include your model number, year and your gas mileage.
#4
#5
RE: What is your city gas mileage
1975 245DL, 25 miles per gallon in the city last tank, and I was only firing on three cylinders for the first sixty miles. I jettisoned some dead weight, though, such as the irreparable A.C. and the super-heavy safety bumpers. Also I tend to coast to stop lights, much to the consternation of the people behind me who want to get to the stop light that won't change for sixty seconds as fast as possible. Also as long as the thing starts reliably I turn it off at real long stop lights.
#7
#9
#11
ANJP, your mileage is pretty typical. It will vary a bit depending on transmission and rear end, but your mileage is pretty much what an automatic with the most common 3.73 rear end turned in when brand new. RWD Volvos were NOT economy cars. Google the EPA mpg estimates and you'll see what I mean. People with 30+mpg from an rwd Volvo are generally full of it or simply do not understand how to compute gas mileage.
#15
Volvos weigh 4,000lbs? Hardly!
240, 740, 940 all weigh between 2,800 and 3,200 lbs... They just "feel' heavy for other reasons, and the only mileage close to 30mpg anyone gets is may be in a well tuned, empty, B230 with a Manual Tranny on a long highway trip in the summer... Otherwise in most cases 22-24mpg is lucky...
But all things considered, most mileage modern cars get is pretty atrocious, so the Volvos are not that bad considering.
240, 740, 940 all weigh between 2,800 and 3,200 lbs... They just "feel' heavy for other reasons, and the only mileage close to 30mpg anyone gets is may be in a well tuned, empty, B230 with a Manual Tranny on a long highway trip in the summer... Otherwise in most cases 22-24mpg is lucky...
But all things considered, most mileage modern cars get is pretty atrocious, so the Volvos are not that bad considering.
#16
City 23
Hwy- 29.5
89, 5 speed
calculated via the old miles/gallons equation. (right swift? )
I was shocked the first couple times I did long hwy drives and was getting close to 30 mpg. I definitely have the most conservative gear ratio though, because I've had a couple volvos and this one is the slowest of them all.
Hwy- 29.5
89, 5 speed
calculated via the old miles/gallons equation. (right swift? )
I was shocked the first couple times I did long hwy drives and was getting close to 30 mpg. I definitely have the most conservative gear ratio though, because I've had a couple volvos and this one is the slowest of them all.
#17
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW): USA Canada
940 (sedan) 4150 lbs (1882 kg) 1880 kg
940 (wagon) 4350 lbs (1973 kg) 1975 kg
940 w/turbo (sedan) 4210 lbs (1910 kg) 1910 kg
940 w/turbo (wagon) 4390 lbs (1991 kg) 1990 kg
Curb weight (sedan) 3185-3265 lbs (1485-
(1445-1481 kg) 1485 kg
Curb weight (wagon) 3265-3350 lbs 1485-
(1481-1520 kg) 1520 kg
#19
Been driving my '89 240 wagon lately. Getting a pretty consistent 20 MPG in mixed driving. I run premium, so I'm assuming that I'm getting full spark advance, but I'm not a particularly economical driver. I expect both mileage and performance to drop dramatically once I get the A/C going. I suspect that I may be due for a new O2 sensor, so it will be interesting to see how much of a difference that makes..
Haven't figured the MPG on my turbo in a while; it's down with a radiator problem at the moment. However, I do know that it's a lot thirstier, and not just because of the turbo. According to the owners manuals of both vehicles, the standard axle ratio for a '91 740 turbo wagon is 4.10, whereas the 240 wagon has the 3.73 that Swift mentioned. Tach readings @ 60 MPH confirm this.
Haven't figured the MPG on my turbo in a while; it's down with a radiator problem at the moment. However, I do know that it's a lot thirstier, and not just because of the turbo. According to the owners manuals of both vehicles, the standard axle ratio for a '91 740 turbo wagon is 4.10, whereas the 240 wagon has the 3.73 that Swift mentioned. Tach readings @ 60 MPH confirm this.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post