My 1/4 mile time sucked...
#1
My 1/4 mile time sucked...
Yesterday on my way home from out of town I checked my 1/4 mile time and I think it stunk.
I did have my wife in the car, a couple of small bags, about a 1/2 tank of gas, full size spare, and a couple of small tool boxes. Anyway, the time was 17.2 seconds. I was expecting something like 15.5, not sure how bad the weight effected it.
One thing I did learn that I was a little surprised about is the the time was the same in E and S. Someone had said that there was no difference @ WOT and they were right (I was wrong). There was no PRE-REV launch on my times, from stand-still idle to 1/4 mile.
I did have my wife in the car, a couple of small bags, about a 1/2 tank of gas, full size spare, and a couple of small tool boxes. Anyway, the time was 17.2 seconds. I was expecting something like 15.5, not sure how bad the weight effected it.
One thing I did learn that I was a little surprised about is the the time was the same in E and S. Someone had said that there was no difference @ WOT and they were right (I was wrong). There was no PRE-REV launch on my times, from stand-still idle to 1/4 mile.
Last edited by rspi; 04-22-2012 at 09:09 AM.
#3
I used to have a Celica that ran steady 13.6's. We experimented with passenger weight. Adding a typical 20 year old to the car lost a 1/2 second. So add up all the stuff you had in the car and yours probably closer to that 15.5 than you think.
If you had made this a guessing game and said you were going to the track and this is what you were going to have in the car then ask what everyone opinions where...I would have said High 16's low 17's.
Ditch the stuff (including the wife)and try again. Preload it.
If you had made this a guessing game and said you were going to the track and this is what you were going to have in the car then ask what everyone opinions where...I would have said High 16's low 17's.
Ditch the stuff (including the wife)and try again. Preload it.
Last edited by boxpin; 04-22-2012 at 11:38 AM.
#4
#6
#7
the sedan and wagon curb weights there is a difference of a few hundred pounds. that rear diff is at least 50 lbs, drive shaft another 50, angle gear is maybe 69 lbs, add a hundred for extra sound dampening, and carpet and other various stuff.
May I ask how you are coming up with those numbers? Best way is to go to the race track and do a controlled test.
May I ask how you are coming up with those numbers? Best way is to go to the race track and do a controlled test.
#9
#10
Brake boost too 3300 rpm's with every thing but you in the car and i guarantee your time will be at least 14.7s I believe our auto trannys are limited to around 190 ft lbs of torque so the brake boost really helps. Your tires will spin for a second but it pretty much eliminates the torque limiter. Don't know if you've ever tried it or not just saying it makes a big difference!!! This is assuming your running 14lbs...
#11
@ Life: I have a ScanGauge II that I use for a lot of stuff. It has a lot of features one of which is to test / track preformance times.
Using Performance Monitor : Linear Logic : Home of the ScanGauge
As for the weight, I used the numbers off the Volvo website.
@ VolvoGuy: The scangauge will not allow you to "launch". As soon as it senses that you press the gas or the car moves it starts the timer.
Using Performance Monitor : Linear Logic : Home of the ScanGauge
As for the weight, I used the numbers off the Volvo website.
@ VolvoGuy: The scangauge will not allow you to "launch". As soon as it senses that you press the gas or the car moves it starts the timer.
Last edited by rspi; 04-23-2012 at 10:05 AM. Reason: add
#12
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
danny72
General Volvo Chat
1
07-24-2015 08:15 AM