General Volvo Chat Post Your Questions And Comments on any of Volvo's many models.

Volvo opinion

Old Sep 27, 2012 | 08:56 PM
  #1  
SwedeDemon's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default Volvo opinion

With the knowledge level being a bit more than mine when it comes to Volvo's I figured I would ask the members what their thoughts would be. I have the option it appears to pick up Saturday one of two Volvos.

The first is a 1998 Volvo V70xc with around 190k. It needs struts and I will probably have to do the TB, WP, pullies unknown mileage for last change.

The second is a 1999 S70 AWD. The car has a CEL for a cam position sensor and has 220k on it(just has the TB, WP, pullies changed 5k ago).

With both being fairly close in price and decently cheap enough what would be the better option?



EDIT: I do all of my own maintenance so price is parts only if that is a deciding factor.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2012 | 10:17 PM
  #2  
meenmokanik's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

definitely go with the V70XC. with the 98 you don't have to worry about the ETM going out or any other CAN related issues. Also the keys/remotes are way cheaper cause they don't have to be programmed with software. And I wouldn't mess with the water pump unless its leaking, volvo water pumps last forever. I'm not a fan of AWD just because of how expensive all the components are if they fail, but since both cars are AWD that isn't going to matter. Hope that helps.
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2012 | 03:53 AM
  #3  
rspi's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 15,736
Likes: 36
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

I agree, get the wagon. They are more useful and are sleepers.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 09:05 AM
  #4  
SwedeDemon's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default

Picked up the XC yesterday. The car overall is in good shape. A NY car with no rust, go figure! The interior is dirty more than it is ruined so a good cleaning should take car of that.

Engine seems to run fine, all fluids check out(will be replacing for piece of mind anyways) Car is slow but for a 190hp 3700lb vehicle I guess that is what you get.

I do have to ask, at some point in its life it had a timing belt change(the sticker is worn) is this something where I should not drive the vehicle until I replace it or should I be ok for two weeks just back and forth to work? I just know from reading that if these go, your vavletrain at minimum decides to look like 80 year old women with scoliosis.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 09:35 AM
  #5  
rspi's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 15,736
Likes: 36
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

If it has been replaced it was likely near 105,000. How many miles are on it now?

Another thing, those cars are not slow by any means. My daughters car has gotten me pulled over more than any other car I have ever driven. Off the line, say 0 - 70 there is not many sedans faster than it and it will smoke the tires so badly that the police will have to wait till the smoke clears before they can safety come get you (I know this from experience-LOL). So, if yours is slow, something is wrong. Our car has the E S W buttons and I don't think yours does. I believe you car has to learn your driving style. Start to drive it aggressively and it will start to respond aggressively.
 

Last edited by rspi; Sep 30, 2012 at 09:38 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 10:12 AM
  #6  
SwedeDemon's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default

I have owned a 94 Camaro with a 396, a 2000 Mustang GT full bolt-on, 4.30 gears and a 125 wet shot, and a 08 Caliber SRT4 stage one with a worked turbo.

Any of those cars would have completely decimated this car to 60 and all reached 60 in way under 6 seconds. These cars seem to be around 8-11 seconds for a 0-60 run, both youtube and site detail confirms this range. I mean no disrespect by saying that it is slow.

The Volvo has 192k on it. I'm sure I will find quirks and things needing to be fixed but I am questioning whether or not it is a time bomb currently without the timing belt done. The car does have the S, E, W buttons under the shifter.
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2012 | 11:44 AM
  #7  
donf's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 673
Likes: 14
Default

Barring someone vouching for the belt, I would change it.
For a stock wagon they are fairly fast. But, since you seem to want to compare it to modified vehicles - some considerably so - I would suggest that you feel free to visit a few Volvo parts sites and start ordering parts! Bigger turbos, better intake routeing, and a less restrictive exhaust should get you going. Don't forget the few ponies to be gained by reprogramming that factory chip.
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2012 | 01:00 PM
  #8  
rspi's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 15,736
Likes: 36
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Ok, the '98 does have the buttons in front of the shifter. Use S = Sports mode. I think our 0-60 time is about 7.3 seconds. I'm sure there are many modded V70's out there that are doing better. But SLOW, by NO MEANS.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2012 | 12:30 PM
  #9  
cattymano's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

What is your opinion of the Volvo S80?
How does it compare to other similar in terms of fuel efficiency, ect.? Is it hard to get parts?
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2012 | 12:53 PM
  #10  
rspi's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 15,736
Likes: 36
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

As long as you stay away from the '99 model you should be ok.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
740man24
Volvo 240, 740 & 940
2
Jul 28, 2006 12:12 PM
bogey
Volvo S40
5
Jul 20, 2006 04:05 PM
cracker_j
Volvo S80
5
May 31, 2006 02:04 AM
AaronD81
Volvo V70
4
Apr 9, 2006 10:36 PM
pgup
Volvo S40
1
Jun 27, 2005 08:47 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 PM.